beyond vietnam rhetorical analysis

Furthermore his speech did not. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam". For instance, he starts by stating the effects of the Vietnam War forced the American poverty program: "experiments, hopes, new beginnings." In his second paragraph, he connects with his audience by saying we have been repeatedly faced, For instance, in the second paragraph of his speech, he says, I could not be silent in the face of such cruel manipulation of the poor. The words silent, cruel, and manipulation speak out to an audience, especially for one that has faced hardship themselves in times of need. StudyCorgi. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. While his words clearly deliver his disappointment over the path American government had chosen, it also expresses a clear intention to not be with the wrong and instead listen to ones inner voice. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". Moreover, Martin Luther King states that after the French were defeated, it looked as if independence and land reform would come again through the Geneva Agreement (King). The war according to King Jr. is nothing more than a political game played for the sake of fun and ego. Martin Luther King Jr is an African American preacher and civil rights activist that along with every other African American male and female in 1976 was waging a war in America for their not-so-natural born rights. On August 28th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr gave us one of one of the most rhetorically moving speeches ever given. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" is an article written by Martin Luther King Jr himself. So far we may have killed a million of them, mostly children (King). And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. His speech emphasizes at transitioning from war to peace and from violence to a nonviolent and peaceful society. Showing his knowledge of the history of the war and using it to discredit the United States reason for being there is crucial to Dr. King in developing his position. King was establishing his point that America was more troubled about healing and adjusting other countries, but would never invest the same in their own country. King uses quotes as these to suggest to convince them of the destruction of the Vietnam War, with pathos, by strongly appealing to his audience's emotion. Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war(8). It is clear that he wants the audience of church leaders to go back to their churches and fearlessly speak out in opposition of the war. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. What Is the Macro Environment in Business Analysis? Dr. King further discredits the United States intentions in Vietnam by comparing us to Germany in World War II saying, What do they think as we test out our latest weapons on them, just as the Germans tested out new medicine and new tortures in the concentration camps of Europe? He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. Using the approach, the context of the speech will be analyzed according to the classical cannon of rhetorical. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. As he notes towards the end of his speech, "If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood ". Read a rhetorical analysis of Martin Luther King Jr's Beyond Vietnam: Time to break silence. If you are the original creator of this paper and no longer wish to have it published on StudyCorgi, request the removal. (These links will automatically appear in your email.). He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. This is a logical fact with which no one can argue. In this way, he personifies war as a demon that consumes people's lives and a nation's valuable resources which would otherwise be happy if it was not being ruined by bombs and bullets. A few lines after, King writes about the injustice the African-American community has faced, by stating, We were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. To further show to the audience how his community has been suffering from the war, he uses a comparison statement between the facts to illustrate how freedom has been hard to attain. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Here, at ACaseStudy.com, we deliver professionally written papers, and the best grades for you from your professors are guaranteed! Dr. Kings purpose is to make the church leaders he is speaking to aware that the time has come for them to speak out loudly in opposition of the war in Vietnam. Through his compelling arguments and moral vision, King inspired many people to join the movement against the Vietnam War and to work for a more just and peaceful world. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. All of Dr. Kings arguments are very effective. He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." In this way, he tries to stress that even if we have progressed, we have grown nowhere better than the ancient barbarians that killed for fun. Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. Due to the Vietnam War is that plenty of individuals, both Americans and Vietnamese were killed. Since an autopsy is only done on dead creatures, King is saying that eventually, the soul of America might die. The imagery paints a dark picture in the audiences mind. However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. (21). Along with calming someone, you can inspire others with your, In Kings speech, the use of sensory and visceral language is abundant, creating an emotional and powerful atmosphere. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. By showing his own emotions, King inspires compassion in the. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. Manacles of discrimination, Lonely island of poverty and Chains of discrimination paint a bleak picture of life as a minority in America, and contrasts phrases such as Bright day of justice and Sacred obligation which symbolize freedom. Then the segregation of African Americans and White Americans started. Martin Luther King notes that we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools (King). Apart from the use of ethos, pathos and logos in his speech, he builds a rock solid argument by involving religious figures and facts from history and philosophy. In a solemn tone, he talks about their crops being destroyed and their water being poisoned, presumably referring to Agent Orange. Correct writing styles (it is advised to use correct citations) Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. ' (Document, The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message. It permits Dr. King to enlighten people of what was going in that time period. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). https://nolongerinvisiblemen.wordpress.com/2014/11/11/sparknotes-for-martin-luther-king-jr-s-a-time-to-break-silence/, https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkatimetobreaksilence.htm, Microsoft Corporation SWOT Analysis (2016), Zora Neale Hurstons Their Eyes were watching God: Analysis. By claiming that the United States, the greatest purveyor of violence, prefers, massive doses of violence to solve its problems, King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. Martin Luther King, Jr indicates that he is seen as a figure of authority by the civil rights movement. By continuing well In his essay, Dr. King uses the metaphor America has given the Negro people a bad check, which came back marked insufficient funds (46). King proved this partly with the quote, America would never invest the necessary funds in the rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued (King, Beyond, 9). (These links will automatically appear in your email.). This comparison is very sobering. Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, "in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village," helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. The speaker comments, that they wander into the hospitals with at least twenty casualties from American firepower for one Vietcong-inflicted injury. His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Ethos, the appeal to the legitimacy and authority of the speaker, is used throughout the speech. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. During this time period there was a lot of controversy surrounding the war. Is Hydrogen Fuel Efficient Enough to Replace Fossil Fuels in the Near Future. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. However, all wanted clarity on the subject. Public Speech. At the heart of their concerns, this query has often loomed large and loud: Why are you speaking about the war, Dr. King? Why are you joining the voices of dissent?(King). He picks from history as well as politics and also supports his choices with philosophical wisdom. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. Later, he mentions, I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. (King). He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. This convinces the reader to fully consider how the war has brought detrimental consequences, and through Kings diction, he is capable of convincing his audience to, When speaking about how the war had initially seem to have brought opportunities, he says, Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor. Evidently, the program for the poor was meant to be used in helping the poor, but as soon as the funds were directed to the Vietnam War, resources were no longer cast in their direction. Right at the outset, King involves religious figures to establish the credibility for his reason and to prove that war was improper and inhuman. Dont King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. King builds an effective argument by using imagery, noting the irony associated with the war, and pointing out the contrast between America before the war and America then. In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. The Braveheart speech, while famous for being powerful, is very different from another powerful speech, the one from Dead Poets Society. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." Hence, Kings works always had the recurring theme of the unity and strength of combined willpower. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. Dr. King's purpose is . For example, King says, We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights (2). Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his views on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers. match. Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence. He believed that the Vietnam War diverted money and attention from domestic programs created to aid the black poor and would benefit only the banks who fund wars and the industries that supply the war. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audiences anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. The American intervention came at a time when the Vietnamese were expecting freedom and peaceful life and it came in a manner that was even devastating compared to the French occupation. The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . Logos appeals to reasoning and argumentation by applying statistics, factual evidence, and data. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. Favorite Quote:What doesn't kill you only makes you stronger. To make his claims stand out and have a deeper impact, he uses instances from Vietnamese history to show the level of injustice faced by its people how war has destabilized them. War makes the innocent lose hope and leaves behind horrific memories for generations on both sides. Martin Luther King was a determined activist for equality for all. Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam". Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. There were many reasons why so many Americans were against the war. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! The war was only going to consume lives and resources. He notes how essential it is to break silence before all hope is lost. His main purpose was to try to persuade the audience to . Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. King wants his audience. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. In conclusion, Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" speech was a powerful and eloquent call for peace and justice. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break. Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism To help his audience see that Vietnam is only madness, a wastage of resources and an ignorance of more pressing concerns, King once again affirms that war was never a means of peace. King makes the nation appears as hypocrites because Americans pretend to fight as a united nation whereas segregation is among the same schools, the same neighborhood, the same country. Dr. King says that the war is draining valuable resources that could be helping the poor in our own country. His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, Beyond Vietnam A Time to Break Silence. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. He successfully proves that The United States has done far more harm to the Vietnamese than good. Dr. King genuinely believes that the war is in direct opposition to the teachings of Christ and therefore the church must speak out in a united voice against it. Pharapreising and interpretation due to major educational standards released by a particular educational institution as well as tailored to your educational institution if different; The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. Through utilising figurative language to juxtapose optimistic progress and demonic destruction, King is able to emphasise how devastating the Vietnam War is. They now also understand that the Vietnam War plays a bigger role in America than just the men gone to war, it affects others too, like them. Acasestudy.com 2007-2019 All rights reserved. For instance, he does when he depicts the, Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. His masterful delivery of these metaphors and the frequent repetition makes the speech much like a poem or a part of a song. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes Americas involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. (2022, May 4). To construct a clear and strong picture and show how condemnable the war exercises in Vietnam were, King compared it with an arena of gladiators which even if it amuses and engages, is something absolutely animal and barbaric. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. For these practical and logical reasons, the church should join the opposition. The audience now feel as though this is very important because it has to do with regular poor people and t effects them as well. As a civil right mover he gave this great speech to all Americans (black and white) so that he could give off the idea of equality on the same level. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence. In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam", Key Ingredients to Being a Successful Student. Apart from highlighting the wicked nature of the war, King Jr 's speech also sets the urgency for protest. This makes the irony explicit and that Vietnam being a smaller and weaker nation was being made to face injustice which it never deserved or desired. He does this when he writes, "It was a step that rocked the richest, most powerful nation to its foundations" (King 96-97). By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. This is an attempt to connect with the audiences emotions and prove that the war was imposed on them and even if politicians call it patriotic, society and people would never love war. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. He tries to make people see the other side of the picture where both black and white men were being pushed into hell without considering and questioning the outcome. In the 1967 speech, Beyond Vietnam, the author, activist Martin Luther King jr, states reasons why America needs to end their involvement in the Vietnam War. He attempts to call upon sympathy within the audience by using highly expressive language. Just like the people of America, the Vietnamese also have a right to live free on the lands of their fathers. Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. In Martin Luther King Jr.s speech Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. Apart from being an advocate of Mahatma Gandhi's idea of nonviolence, Martin Luther King Jr was a great leader and rhetor of all times. All rights reserved. One of Kings main techniques he uses to persuade the audience of his point is imagery. He states, Many people have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. The author is using pathos as one of his central rhetorical strategies. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. StudyCorgi. writing your own paper, but remember to He proves that the government has been manipulating the poor when he writes, It was sending. 2022. You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). Luthers speech was a passionate rhetoric that preached his views about the future. requirements? The rhetoric helps prove how the poor lived worse in the, King, a supporter of President Lyndon B. Johnson and his Great Society, became concerned about U.S. involvement in Vietnam. King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed.

Vancouver New Year's 2022 Fireworks, Does Ey Sponsor International Students, Okr For Data Engineering Team, Andersen Hitch Void Warranty, How To Find Court Records On A Person, Articles B