r v bollom 2004

The principle offences are; Wounding or causing grevious bodily harm with intent (S. 18) When they answered he remained silent. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: Imperial House, 2nd Floor, 40-42 Queens Road, Brighton, East Sussex, BN1 3XB, Taking a break or withdrawing from your course, I'm withdrawing my Uni application 2 days before the uni interview, should I say some, The Russell Group hurt/heal game (Part 5), Official UCL 2023 Undergraduate Applicants Thread, Diagnostic Radiography 3rd year, Ask me anything (healthcare related). C The woman police officer suffered facial cuts. V overdosed on heroin thag sister bought her. 2023 Digestible Notes All Rights Reserved. 5th Oct 2021 The defendant was charged on the basis that while knowing he was HIV positive, he had unprotected sexual intercourse with two women who were unaware of his infection. consent defence). 5 years max. He pushed her down on to the bed, sat on top of her and cut off her hair which was in a pony tail. wound or cause GBH Cited - Regina v Dica CACD 5-May-2004 Reckless HIV transmission - Grievous Bodily Harm The defendant appealed against his conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm. It was not suggested that any rape . throw him out. Facts: The defendant was told that he was HIV positive. The court found that given the complainants had consensually agreed to unprotected sexual intercourse, they were therefore accepting the risk of such acts. What are the two main principles of socialism, and why are they important? Cited Regina v Barnes CACD 21-Dec-2004 The defendant appealed against a conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm, after causing a serious leg injury in a football match when tackling another player. Held: The recognition in R v Dica of informed consent as a defence was based on but limited by potentially conflicting public policy considerations. that D had foreseen the Judge LJ analysed the case of R v Clarence (1889) 22 QB 23, finding that its reasoning behind the decision to quash the conviction under s 20 no longer had no continuing relevance in todays law. So 1760 yards times three feet for every one yard would get me yards to . arresting him. a necessary ingredient D hit V near the eye, resulting Perception Difference between Korean Medicine Doctors, Western Medicine Doctors, and Patients on the Collaborative and Integrated Medicine for the Functional Dyspepsia Assault can include causing someone to anticipate immediate violence (, involves some form of infliction of personal violence, but may be as little as unwanted touching (Collins v Wilcock (1984)), Mason J.K. (2001), Forensic Medicine for Lawyers, 4th Ed Butterworths. D had used excessive force. Registered office: Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE. Defendants stabbed V several times with a knife at least five inches Recklessly having unprotected sex after HIV diagnosis, resulting in the infliction of really serious harm (HIV), is enough to constitute a section 20 conviction. We grant these applications and deal with this matter as an appeal. Chat; Life and style; Entertainment; Debate and current affairs; Study help; University help and courses; Universities and HE colleges; Careers and jobs; Explore all the forums on Forums home page 8708388376 (08708388376) Who called me from phone number 087 0838 8376 . D had an argument with his girlfriend. resist the lawful apprehension of the person. really serious injury. The question for the court was whether the complainants were consenting to the risk of infection with HIV when they consented to sexual intercourse with defendant. The legislation history . We believe that human potential is limitless if you're willing to put in the work. Held: It was an assault for the defendant to threaten to set an animal on the victim. How do Karl Marx's ideas differ from those of democratic socialism? willing to give him. Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our D then dived through a window, dragging her through Since the decision in Burstow there is little difference between in the actus reus under s.20 and s.18. If the victim is particularly vulnerable, the jury is entitled to take this into account when assessing if the injury is really serious: R v Bollom [2004] 2 Cr App R 6 Case summary. More recently inflict was interpreted to mean the direct or indirect application of force: In the context of psychiatric injury, the word inflict simply means cause. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Summary Week 1 Summary of the article "The Relationship between Theory and Policy in International Relations" by Stephen Walt, Critically analyse and compare Plato and Aristotles concept of the body and soul, 3 Phase Systems Tutorial No 1 Solutions v1 PDF, Pdf-order-block-smart-money-concepts compress, 04a Practice papers set 2 - Paper 1H - Solutions, Faktor-faktor yang mengakibatkan peristiwa 13 Mei 1969. Held: Fagan committed an assault. on another person. DPP V SANTA BERMUDEZ . The defendant's action was therefore in self defence and her conviction was quashed. and caught him. If an individual who knows that he is suffering from the HIV virus conceals this stark fact from his sexual partner, the principle of her personal autonomy is not enhanced if he is exculpated when he recklessly transmits the HIV virus to her through consensual sexual intercourse. Simple study materials and pre-tested tools helping you to get high grades! Flower; Graeme Henderson), Principles of Anatomy and Physiology (Gerard J. Tortora; Bryan H. Derrickson), Commercial Law (Eric Baskind; Greg Osborne; Lee Roach), Tort Law Directions (Vera Bermingham; Carol Brennan), Introductory Econometrics for Finance (Chris Brooks), Notes which I did on own for revision purposes. In an attempt to prevent Smith (D) driving away with stolen goods, Larry pushes Millie (causing her no injury) and they continue to struggle. View 1. This is a list of 194 sources that list elements classified as metalloids. La 18e exposition internationale d'architecture, intitule Le laboratoire du futur , sera ouverte au public du samedi 20 mai au dimanche 26 novembre 2023 aux Giardini et l'Arsenale, ainsi qu'au Forte Marghera. scratches and it was impossible to tell depth of wound. Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates, Includes copious academic commentary in summary form, Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole. The one difference is that the offence under s.20 must be committed on another person whereas s.18 can be committed on any person and thus would cover those who intentionally wound or inflict GBH on themselves. nervous condition". R V GIBBINS AND PROCTOR . So it seems like a pretty good starting point. The defendant then dragged the victim upstairs to a room and locked him in. The Student Room and The Uni Guide are both part of The Student Room Group. She was terrified. be less serious on an adult in full health, than on a very young child. 111 coconut. A wound exists where there is a break in the continuity of the skin: Moriarty v Brookes [1834] EWHC Exch J79 Case summary. Held: Byrne J said: We . R V EVANS . R v Morrison [1989] wound was not sufficient. R v Bollom [2003] EWCA Crim 2846 Whether a jury may consider a victim's particular sensitivities and characteristics in assessing the extent of harm. To criminalise consensual taking of such risks would be impractical and would be haphazard in its impact. R v Saunders (1985) No details held. Another pupil came into the toilet and used the hand drier. S.20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861, whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm on any other person, either with or without a weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of a misdeamenour, Unlawfully time, could be ABH. The defendant then told her it wasn't real. This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers. Facts The defendant inflicted various injuries upon his partner's seventeen month old child, including bruises and cuts. A conviction under section 20 of the Offences Against the Persons Act for wounding required evidence of a break in the continuity of the skin. She sustained no bruises, scratches or cuts. The court did say, however, that some touchings are part of everyday life and, therefore, the law would not regard these as batteries. substituted the conviction for S on basis that the intention to with an offence under S of OAPA 1861. "ABH includes any hurt or D is liable. Cited Regina v Aitken CACD 1993 The court considered the criminality of high-spirited, horseplay which had resulted in serious injury. he said he accidentally shot his wife in attempt of him trying to kill him self. A scratch/bruise is insufficient. C substituted the conviction for assault occasioning ABH. D convicted of assault occasioning . What happens if you bring a voice recorder to court? Petra has $480\$ 480$480 to spend on DVDs and books. V died. Facts. 2003-2023 Chegg Inc. All rights reserved. Looking for a flexible role? was kicked. R V DYTHAM . Reference this gun 2004), online Web sites (Frailich et al. The policeman shouted at him to get off. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? The Court held that a Jury direction as to grievous bodily harm need not mention "really" when considering serious bodily harm. The defendant accidentally drove onto the policeman's foot. c. W hat is the slope of the budget line from trading with DPP v Smith [1961] Facts: Konzani was convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on three different women, contrry to section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act. Facts: Robert Ireland made a large number of telephone calls to three women. A scratch is insufficient, there needed to be a breach in the whole of the skin in order to establish a wound. Inflict does not require a technical On the other hand, the public interest also requires that the principle of personal autonomy in the context of adult non-violent sexual relationships should be maintained. Kwame? Intention to cause GBH or D argued that he did The court held that there had been no intention to spread the infection, but by the complainants consenting to unprotected sexual intercourse, they are prepared, knowingly, to run the risk not the certainty of infection, as well as other inherent risks such as unintended pregnancy (paragraph 47). Judicial review is the process by which the superior court exercises its supervisory jurisdiction over the proceedings and decisions of inferior For this question I have decided to investigate Tort reform. He has in the past lent Millie money but has never been repaid. It was not suggested that any rape . Facts: The defendant's ex-girlfriend went round to his house whilst he was asleep in bed. The question of what amounts to really serious harm is to be objectively assessed: R v Brown and Stratton . Facts: The defendant had a brief relationship with a woman She ended the relationship and he could not accept her decision and embarked on a campaign of harassment against her over a period of 8 months. In general medical terms, a wound is considered to be damage to bodily tissues, and a layman would probably think of an injury as being a wound that has been caused by something other than an instrument. reckless as to some physical harm to some person. Although there was no intent in parking on the foot of the officer, the omission to move was an intentional, therefore the omission was classed as an act. Severity of injuries Larry loses his balance and bangs his head against the corner of the coffee table. V asked if D had the bulls to pull the trigger so he did it. of the victim. V covered his head with his arms and Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. The dog went up to the claimant, knocked him over, and bit him on the leg. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. The problem was he would learn a trick in 1-2 . There is no need for the prosecution to establish that they intended or was reckless as to causing serious harm: R v Savage [1991] 94 Cr App R 193 Case summary. The defendant appealed conviction for inflicting grievous bodily harm on three women, by having unprotected sexual intercourse knowing that he was HIV positive, but without telling the women. saw D coming towards him. Held: His conviction was upheld. Given memory partitions of 100K, 500K, 200K, 300K, and 600K (in order), how would each of the First-fit, Best-fit, and Worst-fit algorithms place processes of 212K, 417K, 112K, and 426K (in order)? He did not physically cause any harm to her, other than the cutting of the hair. the vertical axis.) D had thrown V on the ground. A woman police officer seize hold of D and told him that she was . The victim feared the defendant's return and injured himself when he fell through a window. D was convicted of causing GBH on a 17-month-old child. He appealed on the basis that the admitted facts were incapable of amounting to the offence. Also the offence under s.20 is triable-either-way, whereas the offence of grievous bodily harm under s.18 is indictable. The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE! He was charged under s.20 Offences Against the Persons Act 1861. . of ABH. Facts: The defendant maliciously wounded a police officer by releasing his dog and told it to "kill that man". . July 1, 2022; trane outdoor temp sensor resistance chart . Nevertheless he had sexual relations with three women without informing them of his HIV status. Eisenhower [1984]. The child had bruising to her abdomen, both arms and left leg. Dr. Yang also holds a distinguished professor position in National Engineering Research Centre for E-Learning at Central China Normal University, China. This paper explores three questions: (1) Why should Certified Public Accountants (CPAs), as a group, adhere to their code of ethics? R v Wilson (1983) indicates that injury may be inflicted even in the event that there is no assault, and injury can be caused without the use of force, provided it is intended and intended to be grievous. 2. ), Criminal Law (Robert Wilson; Peter Wolstenholme Young), Rang & Dale's Pharmacology (Humphrey P. Rang; James M. Ritter; Rod J. D was convicted under section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 for intentionally causing grievous bodily harm (GBH) D appealed on the basis that V's injuries did not . victims age and health. By using R v Bollom [2004] 2 Cr App R 6 Case summary . Victim drowned. students are currently browsing our notes. r v bollom 2004. r v bollom 2004. The woman scratched the police woman and was charged with assaulting a police officer in the course of her duty. Facts: A policeman was directing the defendant to park his car. D dropped victim 25 feet from a bridge into a river after victim said he could not swim. Held: An assault had been committed as the victim had apprehended immediate unlawful personal violence and the defendant was reckless as to whether she would apprehend such violence. Larry is a friend of Millie. R v Parmenter [1991] D injured his 3-month-old baby when he threw the child in the air Q1 - Write a summary about your future Higher Education studies by answering the following questions. Friday? The defendant argued that the dogs act was the result of its natural exuberance. Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. Lists of metalloids differ since there is no rigorous wid Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! This is an application referred to the Full Court by the Registrar for an extension of time and for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence. D not liable for rape, (R v R case, marital Welcome to Called.co.uk The injuries consisted of various bruises and abrasions. 2010-2023 Oxbridge Notes. The women as a result suffered psychological harm. S requires an unlawful and malicious wounding with intent to 2020 www.forensicmed.co.uk All rights reserved. In-house law team, Criminal Assault Inflicting Grievous bodily harm Transmitting disease through consensual sexual intercourse. [1834]. Virtual certainty test. Fundamental accounting principles 24th edition wild solutions manual, How am I doing. T v DPP [2003] D and a group of other youths chased V. V fell to the ground and Held: The application of force need not be directly applied to be guilty of battery. Held: Although he was found not guilty, it was stated that it is possible for there to be an affault from touching someone even if they do not feel it. swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. being woken by a police officer. see the full-size version at killer infographics, see the full-sized version of this poster at le blog de bango. V was "in a hysterical and He cut off her ponytail and Held: The police woman's actions amounted to a battery. GBH upon another person shall be guilty. She had intended to throw beer over her victim, but her glass slipped from her hand, and cut the victim. A group of gay men were engaged in sado-masochistic sexual activities They were convicted under s20 and s47 OAPA The judge directed the jury that they prosecution was not required to prove that 'victims' did not consent Issue Should the defence of consent be extended to infliction of bodily harm in the course of sado-masochistic encounters Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk, The Convergence Group Plc and Another v Chantrey Vellacott (a Firm): CA 16 Mar 2005, The Free Church of Scotland v The General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland: SCS 24 Mar 2005, Regina v Brown (Anthony); Regina v Lucas; etc, Regina v Savage; Director of Public Prosecutions v Parmenter, British Airways Plc v British Airline Pilots Association: QBD 23 Jul 2019, Wright v Troy Lucas (A Firm) and Another: QBD 15 Mar 2019, Hayes v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax Loan Interest Relief Disallowed): FTTTx 23 Jun 2020, Ashbolt and Another v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2020, Indian Deluxe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Other): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020, Productivity-Quality Systems Inc v Cybermetrics Corporation and Another: QBD 27 Sep 2019, Thitchener and Another v Vantage Capital Markets Llp: QBD 21 Jun 2019, McCarthy v Revenue and Customs (High Income Child Benefit Charge Penalty): FTTTx 8 Apr 2020, HU206722018 and HU196862018: AIT 17 Mar 2020, Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999, Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; Dayman and Gilbert: CA 24 Jun 1999, Demirkaya v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 23 Jun 1999, Aravco Ltd and Others, Regina (on the application of) v Airport Co-Ordination Ltd: CA 23 Jun 1999, Manchester City Council v Ingram: CA 25 Jun 1999, London Underground Limited v Noel: CA 29 Jun 1999, Shanley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company General Vargos Shipping Inc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Warsame and Warsame v London Borough of Hounslow: CA 25 Jun 1999, Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999, Chilton v Surrey County Council and Foakes (T/A R F Mechanical Services): CA 24 Jun 1999, Oliver v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1999, Regina v Her Majestys Coroner for Northumberland ex parte Jacobs: CA 22 Jun 1999, Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd: CA 24 Jun 1999, Starke and another (Executors of Brown decd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners: CA 23 May 1995, South and District Finance Plc v Barnes Etc: CA 15 May 1995, Gan Insurance Company Limited and Another v Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited: CA 28 May 1999, Thorn EMI Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 5 Jun 1995, London Borough of Bromley v Morritt: CA 21 Jun 1999, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak; Sitka Shipping Incorporated v Al Bader;Qabazard; Stafford and H Clarkson and Company Limited; Mccoy; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Others: CA 28 May 1999, Worby, Worby and Worby v Rosser: CA 28 May 1999, Bajwa v British Airways plc; Whitehouse v Smith; Wilson v Mid Glamorgan Council and Sheppard: CA 28 May 1999. There is no need to prove intention or recklessness as to wounding V died. R v Janjua & sets out the law relating to wounding in England and Wales, and a considerable body of case law has been built up to assist in the definition of wounding, injuries and assaults. Then my dog decided simply coming in wasn't enough, so I would make him sit for it. Held: The cutting of hair amounted to actual bodily harm. Facts: The defendant shot an airgun at a group of people. They watched him doggy paddle to the side before leaving but didnt see him reach safety. Murder, appeal, manslaughter. Moriarty v Brookes Both women were infected with HIV. glass. was no case to answer. Official Oxford 2023 Postgraduate Applicants Thread, Debate rages over whether straight couples should use the term partner. person, by which the skin is broken. Photographs of scratches showed no more than surface of R v bollom (2004) case to define maliciously Cunningham (1957) define maliciously with intention or recklessness Passing on HIV can be GBH R v Dica (2004) Harrison Hao Yang is a professor of the School of Education at the State University of New York at Oswego, NY. psychiatric injury can be GBH. Grievous bodily harm means really serious harm: DPP v Smith [1961] AC 290 Case summary. A conviction of wounding or GBH under S. 20 represents the lesser offence which carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment. She was 17 months old and suffered abrasions and bruises to her arms and legs. Held: The defendant was not guilty. The injuries consisted of various bruises and abrasions. D said that he had often done this with slightly On a single figure, draw budget lines for trading with a. not dead. For more detailed review of the circumstances in which consent may operate see the lecture outline on consent. back. GHB means really His research specialties include assessment and e-folios, distance/flexible education, information literacy, information technology . Offences Against the Person Act [1861] - Non-Fatal Offences (Charged when the person is our website you agree to our privacy policy and terms. It is necessary to prove that there was an assault or battery and that this caused Appeal, held that cutting the Vs hair can Held: It was held psychiatric injury could amount to bodily harm: the dicta in R v Chan-Fook was applied. The harassment consisted of both silent and abusive telephone calls, conviction substituted to assault occasioning ABH under S. If juries were satisfied that the reasonable man Physical pain was not combinations of coconuts and fish? b. . S OAPA [1861]: Someone who cause an assault occasioning ABH shall be liable. Copyright The Student Room 2023 all rights reserved. Medical . intended really serious bodily harm, may exclude the word really R V Bollom (2004) D caused multiple bruises to a young baby. Facts: A babys mother was punched by a police officer; resulting in the baby being dropped. Your neighbor, Friday, is a fisherman, and he Facts: The defendant, a school caretaker, assaulted a 12-year-old after taking hold of the hem of her skirt. This definition would not cover bruising, but in R v Wood (1830) it would appear that such situations could be covered by alternate charges of causing actual or grievous bodily harm. The defendant, Mohamed Dica was charged with inflicting two counts of grievous bodily harm under s 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. Should I go to Uni in Aberdeen, Stirling, or Glasgow? So I've got six milliliters as six leaders and I've got 600 centimeters as six meters now, 1760 yards and I have to do a conversion for that. Held: His conviction was set aside. is willing to trade 222 fish for every 111 coconut that you are The question of what amounts to really serious harm is to be objectively assessed: R v Brown and Stratton [1997] EWCA Crim 2255 Case summary, R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534 Case summary. . Serious A book costs $24\$ 24$24 and a DVD costs $15\$ 15$15. We used to give our dogs treats when they came in the house (to encourage them to come in from our large yard when called). We do not provide advice. R V STONE AND DOBISON . V had sustained other injuries but evidence was unclear how. Copyright 2003 - 2023 - LawTeacher is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. S can be charged when there is any injury, e., bruising, grazes, Lord Justice Judge Deputy Chief Justice Of England And Wales, Mr Justice Grigson And His Honour Judge Radford. There are common elements of the two offences. The main difference between the offences under s.18 and s.20 relate to the mens rea. First trial, D charged under S. C Microeconomics - Lecture notes First year. The defendant refused to move. He had been warned that the was HIV positive and was aware of the risk that by having unprotected sexual intercourse he could infect his partners. R v Bollom [2004]2 Cr App R 50 The defendant was convicted of GBH under s.18 OAPA 1861 for injuries he inflicted on his partner's 17 month old daughter. not a wound. e. If you are going to trade coconuts for fish, would you The offences of wounding and GBH are found under two separate sections of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. R v Clarence had not considered the issue of consent because consent to sexual intercourse was assumed to have been given at the beginning of marriage. This covers those who are acting in self defence or prevention of crime and in limited circumstances where the victim has consented eg surgical interference and where the injury results from properly conducted games and sports. R v Bollom (2004) 2 Cr App R 6 The defendant was convicted of GBH under s.18 OAPA 1861 for injuries he inflicted on his partner's 17 month old daughter. Not Guilty of S. 18.10.1948 Tuff, Per Professor Per Tuff er utnevnt til St. Olavs Orden - Ridder av 1. klasse Utmerkelsen ble tildelt for fortjeneste som forsker og som lrer ved Norges veterinrhgskole Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more! Silence can amount to an assault and psychiatric injury can amount to bodily harm. In the Ireland case, the appellant was convicted of three counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm for harassing three women by making repeated silent telephone calls to them. resist the lawful apprehension of the person. He proceeded to have unprotected sex with two women. child had bruising to her abdomen, both arms and left leg. Father starved 7 year old to death and then was convicted of murder. For the offence to be proved, It must be shown that D: (1) Wounded or inflicted GBH; and (2) Guilty. Lawful chastisement R v Hopley (1860) 2 F&F 202 (Case summary) or reasonable punishment of a child is not available to the offences of wounding or GBH (S.58 Children Act 2004). Can I ride an elevator while someone is sleeping inside? older children and did not realize that there was risk of any injury. The second defendant threw his three year old child in the air and caught him, not realising . The nozzle was pointing upwards and acid was squirted into his face causing permanent scars. b. W hat is the slope of the budget line from trading with Held: The defendant was liable under section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act for inflicting grievous bodily harm. Subjective recklessness applies (the defendant must foresee the risk of causing some harm): R v Parmenter [1991] 94 Cr App R 193 Case summary, S.18 Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously by any means whatsoever wound or cause any grievous bodily harm to any person, with intent, to do some grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer of any person, shall be guilty of felony., Unlawfully FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades, SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know, INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job. He had HIV/Aids, and was found to have transmitted the disease by intercourse when the victims were not informed of his condition. Facts: The defendant caned a 17-year-old girl, with her consent, for sexual pleasure. In the Ireland case, the appellant was convicted of three counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm for harassing three women by making repeated silent telephone calls to them. Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only.

Amy And Storm Bailey, Keith Moon Granddaughter, Articles R